zoe @0.0.2
rejected
This version was rejected.
It did not pass GreenFlagged's security review and is not served by the registry.
The findings and risk dispositions below explain why.
68
Risk Score
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
1
Dependencies
5
Dev Dependencies
77.9 KB
Package Size
Published
Stencil Component Starter
Maintainers
sanshine
Dependencies (1)
| Package | Constraint | Registry Status |
|---|---|---|
| @stencil/core | ^2.0.1 | auto_approved |
Dev Dependencies (5)
| Package | Constraint | Registry Status |
|---|---|---|
| jest | ^26.6.3 | auto_approved |
| jest-cli | ^26.6.3 | auto_approved |
| puppeteer | ^5.5.0 | auto_approved |
| @types/jest | ^26.0.24 | No greenflagged match |
| @types/puppeteer | ^5.4.3 | auto_approved |
Transitive Dependency Tree
1 transitive deps
max depth 1
├─
@stencil/core
^2.0.1
→ 2.22.3
Risk Dispositions (1 applicable to this version, 0 other)
Accepted rules are downgraded to INFO on future analyses; rejected rules escalate to CRITICAL.
| Rule | Source | Disposition | Author | Reason | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
bogus-package |
bogus-package | reject | AI | AI (bogus-package): Package has empty entry point (48 bytes), no repo/homepage, link-dump README, and no keywords — consistent spam/bogus indicators that generalize across versions. |
SAST Findings (2)
HIGH
typosquat.levenshtein: Possible typosquat of 'zod'
typosquat
Package name 'zoe' is 1 edit(s) away from popular package 'zod'.
LOW
No provenance attestation
provenance
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
Review Summary
Risk score: 68. Findings: 1 high (+25), 4 medium (+40), 1 low (+3).
Commit: 4e4b36cf9269
Published to npm: