websocket
Websocket Client & Server Library implementing the WebSocket protocol as specified in RFC 6455.
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| source-diff | large-new-source-files | AI (source-diff): Large source file additions reflect test fixtures and examples typical of WebSocket library development, not injected code. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:child-process-import | AI (semgrep): child_process imports in install.js are expected for build-time operations; legitimate use in native binding setup. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): nan is an established native abstraction library; appropriate for native binding development. | ai | |
| install-scripts | install-script:preinstall | AI (install-scripts): node-gyp configure is the standard preinstall pattern for native bindings; stable for websocket. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:es5-ext | AI (dependencies): es5-ext is a well-known polyfill library; appropriate for Node.js compatibility in this package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:utf-8-validate | AI (dependencies): utf-8-validate is a standard native binding for WebSocket UTF-8 validation; appropriate for this package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:bufferutil | AI (dependencies): bufferutil is a standard native binding for WebSocket protocol operations; appropriate for this package's domain. | ai | |
| install-scripts | install-script:install | AI (install-scripts): node-gyp rebuild with graceful fallback is the standard optional native binding pattern for WebSocket-Node; stable across all versions. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:nan | AI (phantom-deps): nan is used in binding.gyp for native addon compilation, not imported in JS — correct usage pattern for native bindings. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Provenance attestation is a best practice but not a security blocker; package has clean history and no malware signals. | ai |
Versions (showing 42 of 42)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0.35 | 6 / 6 | |
| 1.0.34 | 6 / 6 | |
| 1.0.33 | 6 / 6 | |
| 1.0.32 | 6 / 6 | |
| 1.0.31 | 5 / 7 | |
| 1.0.26 | 4 / 7 | |
| 1.0.25 | 4 / 7 | |
| 1.0.24 | 4 / 7 | |
| 1.0.22 | 4 / 6 | |
| 1.0.19 | 3 / 6 | |
| 1.0.18 | 3 / 6 | |
| 1.0.16 | 3 / 5 | |
| 1.0.15 | 3 / 5 | |
| 1.0.13 | 3 / 5 | |
| 1.0.12 | 3 / 5 | |
| 1.0.9 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.0.8 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.0.7 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.0.3 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.0.2 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.0.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.0.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.20 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.19 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.18 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.17 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.16 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.15 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.14 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.13 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.12 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.11 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.10 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.9 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.8 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.7 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.6 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.5 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.4 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.3 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.2 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.1 | 0 / 0 |
v1.0.35
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.34
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.33
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.32
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.31
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.26
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.25
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.24
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.