← Home

waterline-cursor

waterline-cursor ================ [![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/balderdashy/waterline-cursor.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/balderdashy/waterline-cursor) [![npm version](https://badge.fury.io/js/waterline-cursor.svg)](http://badge.fury

7
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

balderdashysgress454particlebanana

Keywords

waterlinesailscursor

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
npm-metadata suspicious-initial-version AI (npm-metadata): Published by balderdashy (Sails.js/Waterline org) with a strong track record; 0.0.0 reflects an early-stage utility package, not a throwaway malicious package. ai
bogus-package bogus-package AI (bogus-package): Sparse README and missing repo URL are consistent with an internal utility from an established org; package keywords and author align with the Waterline ecosystem. ai
provenance publisher-changed AI (provenance): sgress454 is a well-known Sails.js/Waterline core contributor with 1390 approved packages; the 2014 transition from balderdashy is a legitimate org handoff. ai
maintainer-change maintainer-added AI (maintainer-change): sgress454 is a trusted Sails.js ecosystem maintainer; addition is consistent with legitimate team transition within the Waterline project. ai
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Package was first published in 2014, predating Sigstore provenance; absence is expected and not a risk signal for this package. ai

Versions (showing 7 of 7)

Version Deps Published
0.0.7 2 / 6
0.0.6 2 / 8
0.0.5 2 / 0
0.0.4 2 / 0
0.0.3 2 / 0
0.0.2 3 / 0
0.0.0 3 / 0

v0.0.7

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.6

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.5

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.4

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Publisher changed: sgress454 → particlebanana (on 2014-08-04) provenance

[Accepted risk] This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2014-08-04. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

v0.0.3

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: balderdashy → sgress454 (on 2014-08-02) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2014-08-02. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.2

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v0.0.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.