walk
A node port of python's os.walk
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:futures | AI (dependencies): futures is a legitimate async utility package used in older Node.js codebases; its use in this well-established package is expected and not a security concern. | ai | |
| license | uncommon-license:Apache2 | AI (license): Package explicitly dual-licenses under MIT and Apache2; this is intentional and benign for this package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established package from a long-standing publisher; lack of provenance attestation is expected for packages of this age. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:chalk | AI (typosquat): 'walk' is a legitimate, 15-year-old filesystem utility package with no relation to 'chalk'; the Levenshtein match is a clear false positive. | ai |
Versions (showing 22 of 22)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.3.14 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.3.13 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.3.12 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.3.10 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.3.9 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.3.4 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.3.3 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.3.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.3.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.2.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.1.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.1.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.0.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.0.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.0.5 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.0.4 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.0.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.0.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.0.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.9.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.9.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.9.0 | 1 / 0 |
v2.3.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.9.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.9.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.9.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.