subcommand
create CLI tools with subcommands
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Publisher change from maxogden to jhand occurred in Jan 2017 and is a long-standing, legitimate maintainer transition. jhand has a clean track record with 2 approved packages. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): jhand was added as maintainer in 2017; this is a stable, historical transition with no signs of compromise. Generalizes across future versions. | ai | |
| license | uncommon-license:BSD | AI (license): BSD is a well-known permissive license; the uncommon-license flag is a stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established 11-year-old package by known author; lack of provenance is expected for packages predating Sigstore adoption and is not a security concern here. | ai |
Versions (showing 10 of 10)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1.1 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.1.0 | 4 / 2 | |
| 2.0.4 | 4 / 2 | |
| 2.0.3 | 4 / 2 | |
| 2.0.2 | 4 / 2 | |
| 2.0.1 | 4 / 2 | |
| 2.0.0 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.1.1 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.1.0 | 4 / 2 | |
| 1.0.1 | 3 / 1 |
v2.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.1.0
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2017-01-18. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.