rrdom
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:jsdom | AI (typosquat): rrdom is an intentional name in the rrweb ecosystem (rrweb DOM implementation), not a typosquat of jsdom. Stable false positive for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 9 of 9)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.7 | 1 / 15 | |
| 0.1.6 | 1 / 14 | |
| 0.1.5 | 1 / 14 | |
| 0.1.4 | 1 / 14 | |
| 0.1.3 | 1 / 14 | |
| 0.1.2 | 2 / 12 | |
| 0.1.1 | 2 / 12 | |
| 0.1.0 | 2 / 12 | |
| 2.0.0-alpha.20 | 1 / 9 |
v0.1.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.