reqwest
A wrapper for asynchronous http requests
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| source-diff | source-size-tripled | AI (source-diff): Size increase from 11KB to 178KB is explained by addition of legitimate build tool dependencies (uglify-js, jshint, rimraf, gzip, sqwish, asciimo, colors) for this JS packager. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): New deps (uglify-js, jshint, rimraf, gzip, sqwish, asciimo, colors) are all well-known, legitimate build tooling packages consistent with a JS packager tool. | ai | |
| source-diff | large-new-source-files | AI (source-diff): smoosh is a JS build/packaging tool; large number of source files reflects legitimate build tooling dependencies (uglify-js, jshint, etc.), not injected code. | ai | |
| email-domain | unclaimed-email:ded | AI (email-domain): Author field uses '@ded' as a social handle (Twitter/GitHub), not a real email address. 'ded' is not a valid TLD; this is a persistent false positive for this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:valentine | AI (phantom-deps): valentine is used as an Ender.js build/bundle dependency by the same author (Dustin Diaz/@ded), not a direct require(). Expected pattern for this ecosystem. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | bundled-binaries | AI (npm-metadata): vendor/phantomjs is a well-known headless browser used for testing; explicitly excluded from spm distribution. Not a backdoor risk for this established package. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:child-process-import | AI (semgrep): child_process is imported in make/tests.js (test/build tooling), not in runtime code. Expected for a build tool package. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:eval-usage | AI (semgrep): eval() in reqwest.js is a legacy JSON.parse fallback pattern (JSON ? JSON.parse(r) : eval('(' + r + ')')), a well-known safe pattern for old browser compatibility. Not a supply-chain risk. | ai | |
| typosquat | typosquat.levenshtein:request | AI (typosquat): reqwest is a legitimate, intentionally named browser AJAX library by Dustin Diaz (ded), ~15 years old with 72 versions. Not a typosquat of 'request'. | ai |
Versions (showing 71 of 71)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0.5 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.0.4 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.0.3 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.0.2 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.0.1 | 0 / 8 | |
| 2.0.0 | 0 / 8 | |
| 1.1.6 | 0 / 8 | |
| 1.1.5 | 0 / 8 | |
| 1.1.4 | 0 / 8 | |
| 1.1.3 | 0 / 8 | |
| 1.1.2 | 0 / 8 | |
| 1.1.0 | 0 / 8 | |
| 1.0.2 | 0 / 8 | |
| 1.0.1 | 0 / 8 | |
| 0.9.7 | 0 / 8 | |
| 0.9.6 | 0 / 8 | |
| 0.9.5 | 0 / 8 | |
| 0.9.4 | 0 / 8 | |
| 0.9.3 | 0 / 8 | |
| 0.9.2 | 0 / 8 | |
| 0.9.1 | 0 / 8 | |
| 0.9.0 | 0 / 7 | |
| 0.8.2 | 0 / 7 | |
| 0.8.1 | 0 / 7 | |
| 0.8.0 | 0 / 7 | |
| 0.7.3 | 0 / 7 | |
| 0.7.2 | 0 / 7 | |
| 0.7.1 | 0 / 7 | |
| 0.7.0 | 0 / 7 | |
| 0.6.5 | 0 / 7 | |
| 0.6.4 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.6.2 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.6.1 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.6.0 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.5.1 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.5.0 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.4.5 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.4.3 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.4.2 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.4.1 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.4.0 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.3.3 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.3.2 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.3.1 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.3.0 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.8 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.7 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.5 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.2.4 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.2.3 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.2.2 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.2.1 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.2.0 | 1 / 5 | |
| 0.1.9 | 1 / 5 | |
| 0.1.8 | 1 / 5 | |
| 0.1.7 | 1 / 5 | |
| 0.1.6 | 1 / 5 | |
| 0.1.5 | 1 / 5 | |
| 0.1.4 | 1 / 5 | |
| 0.1.3 | 1 / 5 | |
| 0.1.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.1.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 0.0.9 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.8 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.7 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.6 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.5 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.4 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.3 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.2 | 0 / 0 | |
| 0.0.1 | 0 / 0 |
v0.9.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '@ded' uses domain 'ded' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.0
2 findingsMaintainer email '@ded' uses domain 'ded' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.9
2 findingsMaintainer email '@ded' uses domain 'ded' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.8
2 findingsMaintainer email '@ded' uses domain 'ded' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.7
2 findingsMaintainer email '@ded' uses domain 'ded' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.6
2 findingsMaintainer email '@ded' uses domain 'ded' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.5
2 findingsMaintainer email '@ded' uses domain 'ded' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.4
2 findingsMaintainer email '@ded' uses domain 'ded' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.3
2 findingsMaintainer email '@ded' uses domain 'ded' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.2
2 findingsMaintainer email '@ded' uses domain 'ded' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.1
2 findingsMaintainer email '@ded' uses domain 'ded' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.