neotraverse
traverse and transform objects by visiting every node on a recursive walk
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:gopd | AI (dependencies): gopd is a well-known Jordan Harband utility for own property descriptors; legitimate dependency for an object traversal library. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:klona | AI (phantom-deps): klona is a legitimate deep-clone library declared in dependencies; its use in a traversal/transform package is expected and benign. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Package predates widespread Sigstore provenance adoption; no other risk signals present. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/min/index.js | AI (source-diff): Minified production build via terser/tsup; standard traverse library code visible in sample. Stable for this package. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/modern/min/modern.js | AI (source-diff): Minified production build via terser/tsup; standard traverse library code visible in sample. Stable for this package. | ai | |
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Package has SLSA provenance attestation; missing gitHead is a minor metadata gap, not a security concern. | ai |
Versions (showing 15 of 15)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.6.18 | 0 / 7 | |
| 0.6.17 | 0 / 7 | |
| 0.6.16 | 0 / 7 | |
| 0.6.15 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.6.14 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.6.13 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.6.12 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.6.11 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.6.10 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.6.9 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.6.8 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.0.5 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.0.3 | 0 / 6 | |
| 0.0.2 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.0.1 | 4 / 5 |
v0.6.18
4 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: puruvj.
Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v0.6.17
2 findingsPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: puruvj.
v0.6.16
2 findingsPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: puruvj.
v0.6.15
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.14
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.12
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.