lezer-feel
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:dist/index.cjs | AI (source-diff): dist/index.cjs is a rollup-bundled build artifact from lezer-generator; long lines are expected in generated parser tables. | ai | |
| email-domain | unclaimed-email:https://github.com/nikku | AI (email-domain): Author field contains a GitHub profile URL, not an email address; domain-hijack risk does not apply. | ai |
Versions (showing 11 of 11)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0.1 | 3 / 13 | |
| 3.0.0 | 3 / 13 | |
| 2.5.0 | 3 / 13 | |
| 2.4.0 | 3 / 13 | |
| 2.3.2 | 3 / 13 | |
| 2.3.1 | 3 / 13 | |
| 2.3.0 | 3 / 13 | |
| 2.2.1 | 3 / 13 | |
| 2.2.0 | 3 / 13 | |
| 2.1.0 | 3 / 13 | |
| 2.0.0 | 3 / 13 |
v3.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.5.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.4.0
2 findingsMaintainer email 'https://github.com/nikku' uses domain 'https://github.com/nikku' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.2
2 findingsMaintainer email 'https://github.com/nikku' uses domain 'https://github.com/nikku' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.3.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.2.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.2.0
2 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.