fs-utils
fs extras and utilities to extend the node.js file system module. Used in Assemble and many other projects.
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Package predates Sigstore provenance by many years (published 2014); no provenance is expected and not a risk signal for this package. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): doowb is a long-standing, highly-approved publisher in the Assemble ecosystem. This 2014 maintainer addition is a legitimate historical transition. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Publisher change jonschlinkert→doowb occurred in Jan 2014; both are well-known Assemble ecosystem maintainers. Legitimate historical transition, stable for this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:delete | AI (phantom-deps): Dependency is loaded lazily via lazy-cache pattern; not a direct require but genuinely used at runtime. Stable false positive. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:js-yaml | AI (phantom-deps): Dependency is loaded lazily via lazy-cache pattern; not a direct require but genuinely used at runtime. Stable false positive. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:kind-of | AI (phantom-deps): Dependency is loaded lazily via lazy-cache pattern; not a direct require but genuinely used at runtime. Stable false positive. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:relative | AI (phantom-deps): Dependency is loaded lazily via lazy-cache pattern; not a direct require but genuinely used at runtime. Stable false positive. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:is-absolute | AI (phantom-deps): Dependency is loaded lazily via lazy-cache pattern; not a direct require but genuinely used at runtime. Stable false positive. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:extend-shallow | AI (phantom-deps): Dependency is loaded lazily via lazy-cache pattern; not a direct require but genuinely used at runtime. Stable false positive. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:normalize-path | AI (phantom-deps): Dependency is loaded lazily via lazy-cache pattern; not a direct require but genuinely used at runtime. Stable false positive. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:matched | AI (phantom-deps): Dependency is loaded lazily via lazy-cache pattern; not a direct require but genuinely used at runtime. Stable false positive. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:lazy-cache | AI (phantom-deps): lazy-cache is used for lazy-loading; static import analysis will always flag lazily-loaded deps as phantom. This is a stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:async | AI (phantom-deps): Dependency is loaded lazily via lazy-cache pattern; not a direct require but genuinely used at runtime. Stable false positive. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:dynamic-require | AI (semgrep): Dynamic require in fs-utils is a documented try/catch pattern for optionally loading a file as a Node module — a legitimate utility behavior, not a security risk. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:template | AI (dependencies): template is a jonschlinkert package from the same author/ecosystem; no supply-chain concern for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 36 of 36)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.7.0 | 17 / 2 | |
| 0.6.5 | 11 / 2 | |
| 0.6.4 | 11 / 2 | |
| 0.6.3 | 11 / 2 | |
| 0.6.2 | 10 / 2 | |
| 0.6.0 | 11 / 4 | |
| 0.5.0 | 9 / 4 | |
| 0.4.3 | 7 / 2 | |
| 0.4.2 | 7 / 2 | |
| 0.4.1 | 7 / 2 | |
| 0.4.0 | 7 / 2 | |
| 0.3.10 | 8 / 2 | |
| 0.3.9 | 8 / 2 | |
| 0.3.8 | 9 / 2 | |
| 0.3.7 | 9 / 2 | |
| 0.3.6 | 9 / 2 | |
| 0.3.5 | 9 / 2 | |
| 0.3.4 | 9 / 2 | |
| 0.3.3 | 9 / 2 | |
| 0.3.2 | 9 / 2 | |
| 0.3.1 | 9 / 2 | |
| 0.3.0 | 9 / 2 | |
| 0.2.3 | 8 / 2 | |
| 0.2.1 | 8 / 2 | |
| 0.2.0 | 8 / 2 | |
| 0.1.11 | 7 / 2 | |
| 0.1.10 | 7 / 2 | |
| 0.1.9 | 7 / 1 | |
| 0.1.8 | 7 / 1 | |
| 0.1.7 | 6 / 1 | |
| 0.1.6 | 7 / 2 | |
| 0.1.5 | 7 / 2 | |
| 0.1.4 | 4 / 4 | |
| 0.1.3 | 4 / 2 | |
| 0.1.1 | 4 / 2 | |
| 0.1.0 | 1 / 2 |
v0.7.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.2
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2014-02-04. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.3
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2014-02-03. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.0
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2014-02-01. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.11
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2014-01-24. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.5
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2014-01-14. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.4
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
[Accepted risk] This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2014-01-14. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
v0.1.3
2 findings[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
[Accepted risk] This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2014-01-13. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
v0.1.1
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2014-01-13. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.