← Home

ez-spawn

Simple, consistent sync or async process spawning

17
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures No source commit

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

rkrauskopf

Keywords

cliprocessspawnexecsyncasync

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance publisher-changed AI (provenance): Publisher change from rkrauskopf to jamesmessinger is a documented, legitimate transition — both are listed as contributors in package.json and jamesmessinger has a strong track record with 53 approved packages. ai
provenance missing-githead AI (provenance): Established publisher with clean track record; missing gitHead is a publish-environment change, not a malicious indicator for this package. ai
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Package is a well-established namespace redirect wrapper; lack of Sigstore provenance is a process gap, not a security risk for this package. ai

Versions (showing 17 of 17)

Version Deps Published
3.0.4 1 / 0
3.0.3 1 / 0
3.0.2 1 / 0
3.0.1 1 / 0
3.0.0 1 / 0
2.1.6 4 / 10
2.1.5 4 / 10
2.1.4 4 / 10
2.1.3 4 / 10
2.1.2 4 / 10
2.1.1 4 / 10
2.1.0 4 / 10
2.0.1 4 / 10
2.0.0 4 / 10
1.0.0 4 / 9
0.0.2 3 / 10
0.0.1 3 / 10

v3.0.4

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: jamesmessinger.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.0.3

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: jamesmessinger.

v3.0.2

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: jamesmessinger.

v3.0.1

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: jamesmessinger.

v3.0.0

2 findings
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

INFO Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

[Accepted risk] This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: jamesmessinger.

v2.1.6

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.5

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.4

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.3

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.2

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.0

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: rkrauskopf → jamesmessinger (on 2018-12-16) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2018-12-16. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.