escomplex-traits
Traits for escomplex AST walkers.
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Publisher change occurred in 2015; new publisher jaredstilwell has 29 approved packages, repo URL matches new maintainer identity — legitimate historical transition. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): Maintainer addition is a 2015 event consistent with a legitimate project transfer; no malicious signals in any subsequent versions. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | dormant-publish | AI (publish-pattern): Dormancy preceded the 2015 publish; package has been stable for years since with approved dependents and no issues. | ai |
Versions (showing 5 of 5)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3.0 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.2.0 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.1.2 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.1.1 | 0 / 5 | |
| 0.1.0 | 0 / 3 |
v0.3.0
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2015-10-20. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.