dnode
freestyle rpc
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| source-diff | net-exec-file:browser/socket.io.js | AI (source-diff): Socket.IO browser client legitimately uses network transports and new Function() as an empty constructor. This is standard browser WebSocket/XHR library code, not a dropper. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:browser/socket.io.js | AI (source-diff): browser/socket.io.js is the canonical minified Socket.IO 0.6.2 browser bundle (LearnBoost copyright). Minification triggers the long-line heuristic; not obfuscation or malware. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:child-process-import | AI (semgrep): child_process import is in an example file (examples/multiprocess/server.js), not library runtime code. No supply-chain risk. | ai | |
| source-diff | net-exec-file:examples/chat/node_modules/jquery-browserify/lib/jquery-1.6.1.js | AI (source-diff): This is the canonical jQuery 1.6.1 library bundled in an example chat app's node_modules. Network calls and eval-like patterns are standard jQuery behavior, not malware. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:new-function-constructor | AI (semgrep): new Function() appears in a browserify bundle.js — standard module system pattern in bundled JS, not a dynamic code execution risk for this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:traverse | AI (phantom-deps): traverse is referenced in config files only, not imported at runtime; stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Package predates Sigstore provenance on npm by many years; absence of attestation is expected and not a risk signal for this package. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:eval-usage | AI (semgrep): eval() in lib/web/compat.js is a JSON.parse polyfill for old browser compat — a well-known benign pattern from the early Node/browser era, not a supply-chain risk. | ai |
Versions (showing 74 of 74)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2.2 | 3 / 1 | |
| 1.2.0 | 3 / 1 | |
| 1.1.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 1.0.5 | 3 / 2 | |
| 1.0.4 | 3 / 2 | |
| 1.0.2 | 3 / 2 | |
| 1.0.1 | 3 / 2 | |
| 0.9.12 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.9.11 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.9.10 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.9.9 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.9.8 | 5 / 4 | |
| 0.9.6 | 6 / 3 | |
| 0.9.5 | 6 / 3 | |
| 0.9.4 | 6 / 3 | |
| 0.9.3 | 6 / 3 | |
| 0.9.0 | 5 / 3 | |
| 0.8.2 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.8.1 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.8.0 | 4 / 3 | |
| 0.7.5 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.7.4 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.7.3 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.7.1 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.7.0 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.6.12 | 5 / 1 | |
| 0.6.11 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.6.10 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.6.9 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.6.8 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.6.7 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.6.6 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.6.5 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.6.4 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.6.3 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.6.2 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.6.1 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.6.0 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.5.9 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.5.8 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.5.7 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.5.6 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.5.5 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.5.4 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.5.3 | 5 / 0 | |
| 0.5.2 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.5.1 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.5.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.4.5 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.4.4 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.4.3 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.4.2 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.4.1 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.4.0 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.3.11 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.3.10 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.3.9 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.3.8 | 4 / 0 | |
| 0.3.7 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.3.6 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.3.5 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.3.3 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.3.2 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.3.1 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.3.0 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.2.13 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.2.12 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.2.11 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.2.10 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.2.9 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.2.7 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.2.6 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.2.5 | 3 / 0 | |
| 0.2.4 | 3 / 0 |
v1.2.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.0
2 findingsNewly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.0
3 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.4.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.4.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.4.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.4.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.13
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.2.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.