date-time
Pretty datetime: `2014-01-09 06:46:01`
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): sindresorhus packages consistently lack Sigstore provenance; this is a stable characteristic of this publisher's workflow, not a security concern. | ai |
Versions (showing 9 of 9)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0.0 | 1 / 3 | |
| 3.1.0 | 1 / 3 | |
| 3.0.0 | 1 / 3 | |
| 2.1.0 | 1 / 2 | |
| 2.0.0 | 1 / 2 | |
| 1.1.0 | 1 / 2 | |
| 1.0.0 | 0 / 1 | |
| 0.1.1 | 0 / 1 | |
| 0.1.0 | 0 / 1 |
v2.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.