bluebird-retry
utility for retrying a bluebird promise until it succeeds
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| source-diff | net-exec-file:browser/bluebird-retry.umd.js | AI (source-diff): The file is a standard webpack/browserify UMD bundle. The 'network + code execution' pattern is webpack bootstrap boilerplate, not malware. Bluebird bundles legitimately include this pattern. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:new-function-constructor | AI (semgrep): Occurs inside an `if (false)` dead-code block in the bluebird bundle. Never executed at runtime; this is a known bluebird optimization pattern. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:eval-usage | AI (semgrep): The eval() call appears after a return statement (unreachable dead code) in the bluebird bundle. Not a real execution risk. | ai | |
| source-diff | source-size-tripled | AI (source-diff): Size increase is entirely due to addition of a browser UMD bundle, consistent with devDependencies (browserify, vinyl-source-stream) and the files field listing browser/*.js. | ai |
Versions (showing 18 of 18)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.11.0 | 0 / 12 | |
| 0.10.1 | 0 / 12 | |
| 0.10.0 | 0 / 12 | |
| 0.9.0 | 0 / 12 | |
| 0.8.0 | 0 / 12 | |
| 0.7.0 | 0 / 11 | |
| 0.6.1 | 0 / 11 | |
| 0.6.0 | 0 / 11 | |
| 0.5.3 | 1 / 4 | |
| 0.5.2 | 1 / 4 | |
| 0.5.1 | 1 / 4 | |
| 0.5.0 | 2 / 3 | |
| 0.4.0 | 2 / 3 | |
| 0.3.2 | 2 / 3 | |
| 0.3.1 | 2 / 3 | |
| 0.3.0 | 2 / 3 | |
| 0.2.0 | 2 / 3 | |
| 0.1.0 | 2 / 3 |
v0.11.0
2 findingsNewly added file contains both network calls and dynamic code execution. This is a hallmark of dropper/loader malware.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.10.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.10.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.9.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.8.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.7.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.6.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.5.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.4.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.3.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.