babel-plugin-transform-es2015-block-scoped-functions
Babel plugin to ensure function declarations at the block level are block scoped
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Legitimate maintainer transition from sebmck (Babel creator) to hzoo (Babel core maintainer); well-documented handoff in the Babel project. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Babel 6.x ecosystem packages were legitimately mass-published by the Babel core team; spam/mass-production signals are false positives for this well-established package family. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Package predates Sigstore provenance by years; no provenance is expected and not a risk signal for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 14 of 14)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 6.22.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 6.8.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 6.6.5 | 1 / 1 | |
| 6.6.4 | 1 / 1 | |
| 6.5.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 6.3.13 | 1 / 1 | |
| 6.2.4 | 1 / 1 | |
| 6.1.18 | 1 / 1 | |
| 6.1.17 | 1 / 1 | |
| 6.1.10 | 1 / 1 | |
| 6.1.5 | 1 / 1 | |
| 6.1.4 | 1 / 1 | |
| 6.0.14 | 1 / 0 | |
| 6.0.2 | 1 / 0 |
v6.22.0
2 findingsMatched 3 signal(s), weighted score 7: • [S_KNOWN_SPAM_PUBLISHER] Maintainer(s) previously flagged as spam: sebmck, jmm, amasad, thejameskyle, hzoo, loganfsmyth. • [S_PUBLISHER_MASS_PRODUCTION] Maintainer 'loganfsmyth' owns 167 packages, ≥70% share a templated name shape. • [S_TINY_PAYLOAD] Tiny payload: 1 code file(s), 2709 bytes total.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.8.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.6.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.6.4
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2016-03-02. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.5.0
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2016-02-07. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.3.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.2.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.1.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.1.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.1.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.1.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.1.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.0.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v6.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.