@yarnpkg/libzip
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:lib/libzipAsync.js | AI (source-diff): This is an Emscripten-compiled WASM wrapper for libzip. Long lines are inherent to Emscripten output; not obfuscation. Stable pattern for this package. | ai | |
| source-diff | obfuscated-file:lib/libzipSync.js | AI (source-diff): Same as libzipAsync.js — Emscripten WASM bundle for libzip. Long lines are expected from the Emscripten toolchain, not malicious obfuscation. | ai | |
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): yarnbot is the official Yarn project automation account; publisher transition from arcanis to yarnbot is a documented org-level change, not a compromise. Stable for this package. | ai | |
| email-domain | unclaimed-email:rome.tools | AI (email-domain): Co-maintainer email using defunct rome.tools domain; primary publisher is arcanis (Yarn core maintainer) with strong track record. Risk of hijack affecting this package is low. | ai | |
| semgrep | semgrep:base64-decode | AI (semgrep): Base64 decode is in Emscripten-compiled WASM wrapper (libzipAsync.js); standard pattern for embedding WASM binaries, not a malicious payload indicator. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@types/emscripten | AI (phantom-deps): Expected phantom dep for a WASM/Emscripten-based package; @types/emscripten is a type-only dev dependency used by convention. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Established Yarn Berry monorepo package; missing description is a known metadata gap, not a malicious signal. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Well-known Yarn Berry monorepo package; metadata signals (no description, no keywords, cpojer as maintainer) are expected for this ecosystem package and not indicative of spam. | ai |
Versions (showing 13 of 13)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 3.2.1 | 3 / 3 | |
| 3.2.0 | 3 / 3 | |
| 3.1.1 | 3 / 2 | |
| 3.1.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 3.0.1 | 3 / 2 | |
| 3.0.0 | 3 / 2 | |
| 2.3.0 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.2.4 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.2.3 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.2.2 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.2.1 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.2.0 | 2 / 2 | |
| 2.1.0 | 2 / 2 |
v3.2.1
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v3.2.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v3.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.0.0
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2023-10-22. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.0
3 findingsMatched 4 signal(s), weighted score 7: • [S_KNOWN_SPAM_PUBLISHER] Maintainer(s) previously flagged as spam: sebmck, cpojer. • [S_README_NO_CODE] Short README with no code block, no install instructions, and no usage/API section. • [S_DESC_MATCHES_NAME] Description is empty or just restates the package name. • [S_NO_KEYWORDS] No keywords declared.
Maintainer email '[email protected]' uses domain 'rome.tools' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.2.4
3 findingsNewly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Newly added source file contains lines over 3000 chars, suggesting minified or obfuscated code. New obfuscated files are a strong attack indicator.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.2.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.2.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.2.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.