@types/sinon-chai
TypeScript definitions for sinon-chai
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| email-domain | unclaimed-email:https://github.com/kazimanzurrashid/ | AI (email-domain): Author field contains a GitHub URL, not an email; domain parser misfire. Stable FP for @types packages. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@types/chai | AI (dependencies): @types/chai is a standard DefinitelyTyped peer dependency for sinon-chai type definitions; this pattern is stable across all versions of this package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): DefinitelyTyped packages published via the types publisher do not use Sigstore provenance; this is a stable characteristic of the package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@types/chai | AI (phantom-deps): @types/* packages declare type dependencies loaded by the TypeScript compiler by convention, not via direct imports. This is expected and stable for all versions of this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@types/sinon | AI (phantom-deps): @types/* packages declare type dependencies loaded by the TypeScript compiler by convention, not via direct imports. This is expected and stable for all versions of this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 31 of 31)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0.0 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.2.12 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.2.11 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.2.10 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.2.9 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.2.8 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.2.7 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.2.6 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.2.5 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.2.4 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.2.3 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.2.2 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.2.1 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.2.0 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.42 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.41 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.40 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.39 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.38 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.37 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.36 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.35 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.34 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.33 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.32 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.31 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.30 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.29 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.28 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.27 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.7.26 | 2 / 0 |
v3.2.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.2.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.2.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.2.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.2.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.2.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.2.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.2.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.2.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.2.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.2.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.42
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.41
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.40
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.39
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.38
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.37
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.36
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.35
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.34
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.33
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.32
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.31
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.30
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.7.29
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.28
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.27
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.7.26
2 findingsMaintainer email 'https://github.com/kazimanzurrashid/' uses domain 'https://github.com/kazimanzurrashid/' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.