@types/hammerjs
TypeScript definitions for hammerjs
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| email-domain | unclaimed-email:https://github.com/milkisevil/ | AI (email-domain): The 'email' field is actually a GitHub profile URL used in the author string, not a real email address. No actual email domain is at risk of hijacking. This is a stable false positive for this package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): DefinitelyTyped @types packages published by the trusted 'types' publisher do not use Sigstore provenance; this is expected and stable across all versions. | ai |
Versions (showing 25 of 25)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0.46 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.45 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.44 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.43 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.42 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.41 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.40 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.39 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.38 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.37 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.36 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.35 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.34 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.33 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.32 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.31 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.29 | 0 / 0 | |
| 2.0.28 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.1.6 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.1.5 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.1.4 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.1.3 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.1.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.1.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.1.0 | 1 / 0 |
v2.0.46
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.45
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.44
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.43
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.42
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.41
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.40
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.39
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.38
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.37
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.36
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.35
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.34
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.33
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.32
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.31
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.29
2 findingsMaintainer email 'https://github.com/milkisevil/' uses domain 'https://github.com/milkisevil/' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.28
2 findingsMaintainer email 'https://github.com/milkisevil/' uses domain 'https://github.com/milkisevil/' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.1.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.