@types/chokidar
Stub TypeScript definitions entry for chokidar, which provides its own types definitions
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| email-domain | unclaimed-email:https://github.com/reppners/ | AI (email-domain): The 'email' field contains a GitHub profile URL, not an email address. The analyzer misidentifies github.com as an unclaimed domain. This is a stable false positive for this DefinitelyTyped package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@types/node | AI (phantom-deps): @types/node is a type-only dependency in a TypeScript definitions package; it does not need to be directly imported. This is expected behavior for @types packages. | ai |
Versions (showing 16 of 16)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1.7 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.1.6 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.1.5 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.1.4 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.1.3 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.7.5 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.7.4 | 2 / 0 | |
| 1.7.3 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.7.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.7.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.7.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.6.0 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.4.31 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.4.30 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.4.29 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.4.28 | 1 / 0 |
v2.1.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.7.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.7.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.7.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.7.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.7.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.7.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.6.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.31
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.30
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.29
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.4.28
2 findingsMaintainer email 'https://github.com/reppners/' uses domain 'https://github.com/reppners/' which has no DNS records. An attacker could register this domain to hijack the maintainer identity.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.