← Home

@parcel/hash

24
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

devongovett

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
typosquat typosquat.levenshtein:hapi AI (typosquat): @parcel/hash is the official Parcel bundler hashing utility under the @parcel npm scope; no typosquat relationship to 'hapi' exists. ai
npm-metadata no-description AI (npm-metadata): Established native binding package; missing description is a minor metadata gap, not a malice indicator. ai
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Provenance attestation is a best-practice gap; not a blocker for an established, well-maintained package. ai
npm-metadata bundled-binaries AI (npm-metadata): @parcel/hash is a NAPI-RS native addon; bundled .node binaries are the expected delivery mechanism for prebuilt platform-specific binaries. ai
semgrep semgrep:dynamic-require AI (semgrep): Dynamic require is the standard NAPI-RS platform-selection pattern, loading one of the bundled .node files based on OS/arch — not arbitrary module loading. ai
dependencies unvetted-dep:detect-libc AI (dependencies): detect-libc is a well-known utility used by native addons to distinguish glibc vs musl Linux; its use here is expected and benign. ai

Versions (showing 24 of 24)

Version Deps Published
2.9.3 1 / 2
2.9.2 1 / 2
2.9.1 1 / 2
2.9.0 1 / 2
2.8.3 2 / 2
2.8.2 2 / 2
2.8.1 2 / 2
2.8.0 2 / 2
2.7.0 2 / 2
2.6.2 2 / 2
2.6.1 2 / 2
2.6.0 2 / 2
2.5.0 2 / 2
2.4.1 2 / 2
2.4.0 2 / 2
2.3.2 2 / 2
2.3.1 2 / 2
2.3.0 2 / 2
2.2.1 2 / 2
2.2.0 2 / 2
2.1.1 2 / 2
2.1.0 2 / 2
2.0.1 2 / 2
2.0.0 2 / 2

v2.9.3

2 findings
HIGH Bundled binary files (8) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • parcel-hash.darwin-arm64.node • parcel-hash.darwin-x64.node • parcel-hash.linux-arm-gnueabihf.node • parcel-hash.linux-arm64-gnu.node • parcel-hash.linux-arm64-musl.node • parcel-hash.linux-x64-gnu.node • parcel-hash.linux-x64-musl.node • parcel-hash.win32-x64-msvc.node

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.9.2

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.9.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.9.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.8.3

2 findings
HIGH Bundled binary files (8) npm-metadata

Package contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • parcel-hash.darwin-arm64.node • parcel-hash.darwin-x64.node • parcel-hash.linux-arm-gnueabihf.node • parcel-hash.linux-arm64-gnu.node • parcel-hash.linux-arm64-musl.node • parcel-hash.linux-x64-gnu.node • parcel-hash.linux-x64-musl.node • parcel-hash.win32-x64-msvc.node

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.8.2

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.8.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.8.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.7.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.6.2

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.6.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.6.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.5.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.4.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.4.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.3.2

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.3.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.3.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.2.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.2.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.1.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.