@napi-rs/lzma-android-arm-eabi
https://docs.rs/lzma-rs binding to Node.js via https://napi.rs
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Transition from broooooklyn to GitHub Actions is the standard napi-rs CI/CD automation pattern; repo ownership remains with Brooooooklyn and SLSA attestation confirms trusted pipeline provenance. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | bundled-binaries | AI (npm-metadata): Platform-specific .node binary is the entire purpose of this napi-rs platform package; SLSA provenance attestation validates its build origin. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): napi-rs platform-specific sub-packages intentionally have no deps, minimal README, and no install instructions — they are binary-only distribution artifacts. | ai |
Versions (showing 13 of 13)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4.5 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.4.4 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.4.3 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.4.2 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.4.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.4.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.3.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.3.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.2.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.2.0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.1.2 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.1.1 | 0 / 0 | |
| 1.1.0 | 0 / 0 |
v1.4.5
3 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • lzma.android-arm-eabi.node
This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2025-08-10. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.4.4
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.4.3
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.4.2
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.4.1
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.4.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.3.1
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.3.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.2.1
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.2.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v1.1.2
2 findingsPackage contains compiled binaries that could be backdoors: • lzma.android-arm-eabi.node
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.