@metamask/money-account-upgrade-controller
MetaMask Money account upgrade controller
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): MetaMask packages publish via GitHub Actions CI with SLSA attestation; publisher=GitHub Actions is the expected pattern. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): New maintainers are MetaMask org members; stable for this package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): MetaMask/core monorepo packages consistently lack Sigstore provenance; stable false positive for this publisher. | ai |
Versions (showing 12 of 12)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0.5 | 10 / 11 | |
| 2.0.4 | 10 / 11 | |
| 2.0.3 | 10 / 11 | |
| 2.0.2 | 10 / 11 | |
| 2.0.1 | 10 / 11 | |
| 2.0.0 | 10 / 11 | |
| 1.3.2 | 6 / 10 | |
| 1.3.1 | 6 / 10 | |
| 1.3.0 | 6 / 10 | |
| 1.2.0 | 6 / 10 | |
| 1.1.0 | 6 / 10 | |
| 1.0.0 | 4 / 11 |
v2.0.5
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-06-11. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v2.0.4
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-06-09. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v2.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.3.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.