@libp2p/interface-keychain
Keychain interface for libp2p
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm-metadata | suspicious-initial-version | AI (npm-metadata): 0.0.0 is a standard monorepo placeholder version for js-libp2p-interfaces packages managed by semantic-release; not indicative of malicious intent for this well-established package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Legitimate libp2p ecosystem package; lack of provenance is common and not a risk signal here. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@libp2p/interface-peer-id | AI (dependencies): Sibling libp2p interface package; expected dependency within the libp2p ecosystem. | ai |
Versions (showing 16 of 16)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0.5 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.4 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.3 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.2 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.1 | 2 / 1 | |
| 2.0.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.0.8 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.0.7 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.0.6 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.0.5 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.0.4 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.0.3 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.0.2 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.0.1 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.0.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 0.0.0 | 1 / 1 |
v2.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.