@jest/pattern
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@types/node | AI (phantom-deps): @types/node is a type-only dep used by convention; stable FP for this package. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Jest monorepo packages routinely start at high semver versions aligned with the monorepo release, have minimal READMEs, and no keywords. These signals are structural false positives for this package family. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Internal Jest monorepo utility packages commonly omit standalone descriptions; not indicative of malicious intent. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:jest-regex-util | AI (dependencies): jest-regex-util is a sibling Jest monorepo package published at the same version; unvetted status is a pipeline lag, not a real risk. | ai |
Versions (showing 6 of 6)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 30.4.0 | 2 / 0 | |
| 30.0.1 | 2 / 0 | |
| 30.0.0 | 2 / 0 | |
| 30.0.0-beta.8 | 2 / 0 | |
| 30.0.0-beta.6 | 2 / 0 | |
| 30.0.0-beta.3 | 2 / 0 |
v30.4.0
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-05-07. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v30.0.0-beta.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v30.0.0-beta.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v30.0.0-beta.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.