@jest/environment-jsdom-abstract
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): simenb is a known Jest core maintainer; cpojer→simenb is a legitimate team handoff. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | dormant-publish | AI (publish-pattern): Jest publishes in batches with gaps between major releases; dormancy is normal. | ai | |
| bogus-package | bogus-package | AI (bogus-package): Inflated semver is a false positive for Jest monorepo packages; version matches the Jest release cycle. No description/keywords are cosmetic issues in monorepo packages. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@types/node | AI (phantom-deps): @types/node is a standard TypeScript type dependency in Jest packages; loaded by convention, not a phantom dep concern. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@types/jsdom | AI (phantom-deps): @types/jsdom is a standard TypeScript type dependency for jsdom environments; loaded by convention. | ai | |
| npm-metadata | no-description | AI (npm-metadata): Missing description is a cosmetic issue common in Jest monorepo packages; not a malware indicator for this publisher. | ai |
Versions (showing 12 of 12)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 30.4.1 | 7 / 2 | |
| 30.4.0 | 7 / 2 | |
| 30.3.0 | 7 / 2 | |
| 30.2.0 | 7 / 2 | |
| 30.1.2 | 7 / 1 | |
| 30.1.1 | 7 / 1 | |
| 30.1.0 | 7 / 1 | |
| 30.0.5 | 7 / 1 | |
| 30.0.4 | 7 / 1 | |
| 30.0.2 | 7 / 1 | |
| 30.0.1 | 7 / 1 | |
| 30.0.0 | 7 / 1 |
v30.4.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v30.4.0
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-05-07. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v30.2.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v30.1.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v30.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v30.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v30.0.5
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v30.0.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v30.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v30.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v30.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.