@inquirer/expand
Inquirer checkbox prompt
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): yoctocolors-cjs is a legitimate, widely-trusted terminal color utility by Sindre Sorhus; its addition is consistent with CLI prompt functionality for this package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:figures | AI (dependencies): figures is a well-known, legitimate npm package for terminal symbols, appropriate for a CLI prompt library like @inquirer/expand. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:figures | AI (phantom-deps): figures is a declared runtime dependency; phantom-dep finding reflects indirect usage pattern, not a security concern for this package. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Established @inquirer/* monorepo package by original author sboudrias; lack of Sigstore provenance is not a meaningful risk signal here. | ai |
Versions (showing 51 of 83)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1.1 | 2 / 2 | |
| 5.1.0 | 2 / 2 | |
| 5.0.14 | 2 / 2 | |
| 5.0.13 | 2 / 2 | |
| 5.0.12 | 2 / 2 | |
| 5.0.11 | 2 / 2 | |
| 5.0.10 | 2 / 2 | |
| 5.0.9 | 2 / 2 | |
| 5.0.8 | 2 / 3 | |
| 5.0.7 | 2 / 3 | |
| 5.0.6 | 2 / 3 | |
| 5.0.5 | 2 / 3 | |
| 5.0.4 | 2 / 3 | |
| 5.0.3 | 2 / 3 | |
| 5.0.2 | 2 / 3 | |
| 5.0.1 | 2 / 3 | |
| 5.0.0 | 2 / 3 | |
| 4.0.23 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.22 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.21 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.20 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.19 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.18 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.17 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.16 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.15 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.14 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.13 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.12 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.11 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.10 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.9 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.8 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.7 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.6 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.5 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.4 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.3 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.2 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.1 | 3 / 4 | |
| 4.0.0 | 3 / 4 | |
| 3.0.1 | 3 / 1 | |
| 3.0.0 | 3 / 1 | |
| 2.3.0 | 3 / 1 | |
| 2.2.0 | 3 / 1 | |
| 2.1.22 | 3 / 1 | |
| 2.1.21 | 3 / 1 | |
| 2.1.20 | 3 / 1 | |
| 2.1.19 | 3 / 1 | |
| 2.1.18 | 3 / 1 | |
| 2.1.17 | 3 / 1 |
v5.1.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.1.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v5.0.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v5.0.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v5.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v4.0.23
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v4.0.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v4.0.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.16
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.14
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v4.0.13
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v4.0.12
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.11
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.8
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.7
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.3
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v4.0.2
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v4.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v4.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v3.0.1
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.0.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.3.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.2.0
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.22
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.21
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.20
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.19
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.18
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.1.17
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.