@grafana/components
Product Design Engineering Components for Grafana
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | missing-githead | AI (provenance): Grafana's CI pipeline change explains missing gitHead; consistent with other build script changes in this version. | ai | |
| publish-pattern | new-deps-added | AI (publish-pattern): clsx is a well-established, widely-used utility; no malicious history or supply chain risk. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:clsx | AI (phantom-deps): clsx is a well-known utility; phantom-dep fires because it's referenced in config/build files rather than directly imported in source. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@grafana/data | AI (dependencies): First-party Grafana package; stable dependency for this Grafana component library. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@grafana/design-tokens | AI (dependencies): First-party Grafana design system package; expected dependency for this library. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:react-useportal | AI (dependencies): Well-known React portal utility; low risk for a UI component library. | ai | |
| source-diff | large-new-source-files | AI (source-diff): Size increase driven by icon asset files (iconMetaData.js, allIcons.js) added in this version; expected for a component library. | ai | |
| source-diff | source-size-tripled | AI (source-diff): Growth attributable to icon data assets and rollup build output; not injected payload. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@grafana/data | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org @grafana/data; declared as peer/dep in a component library, phantom-dep heuristic is a stable false positive here. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Grafana org package published via grafanabot; provenance absence is common and not a risk signal here. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@emotion/react | AI (phantom-deps): @emotion/react is a declared runtime dep used in build/config context; phantom-dep heuristic false positive for this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:react-useportal | AI (phantom-deps): Declared runtime dep; phantom-dep heuristic false positive for this package. | ai |
Versions (showing 15 of 15)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3.0 | 8 / 28 | |
| 0.0.63 | 6 / 61 | |
| 0.0.60 | 6 / 61 | |
| 0.0.33 | 9 / 49 | |
| 0.0.24 | 8 / 50 | |
| 0.0.22 | 8 / 50 | |
| 0.0.17 | 8 / 50 | |
| 0.0.15 | 8 / 50 | |
| 0.0.10 | 7 / 42 | |
| 0.0.9 | 7 / 42 | |
| 0.0.8 | 7 / 42 | |
| 0.0.6 | 7 / 42 | |
| 0.0.5 | 7 / 41 | |
| 0.0.4 | 7 / 41 | |
| 0.0.3 | 7 / 41 |
v0.3.0
2 findingsThis version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: GitHub Actions.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.60
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2026-03-31. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.33
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.24
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.22
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.17
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.15
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.10
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.9
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.6
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.