@done-coding/cli-ai
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@done-coding/cli-component | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org sibling package; dynamic/lazy loading pattern expected in this monorepo CLI. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:create-done-coding | AI (phantom-deps): CLI scaffolding tool; referenced in config, not directly imported — stable pattern for this package. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@done-coding/cli-config | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org sibling package; dynamic/lazy loading pattern expected in this monorepo CLI. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@done-coding/cli-inject | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org sibling package; dynamic/lazy loading pattern expected in this monorepo CLI. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@done-coding/cli-extract | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org sibling package; dynamic/lazy loading pattern expected in this monorepo CLI. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@done-coding/cli-publish | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org sibling package; dynamic/lazy loading pattern expected in this monorepo CLI. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@done-coding/cli-template | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org sibling package; dynamic/lazy loading pattern expected in this monorepo CLI. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): New package from a small org; lack of provenance is common and no other risk signals present. | ai |
Versions (showing 7 of 7)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1.6 | 10 / 8 | |
| 0.1.5 | 10 / 8 | |
| 0.1.4 | 10 / 8 | |
| 0.1.3 | 2 / 9 | |
| 0.1.2 | 2 / 9 | |
| 0.1.1 | 2 / 9 | |
| 0.1.0 | 2 / 9 |
v0.1.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v0.1.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v0.1.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.