@csstools/postcss-logical-viewport-units
Use vb and vi length units in CSS
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Keywords
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| provenance | publisher-changed | AI (provenance): Publisher change from alaguna to romainmenke is a documented legitimate transition; both are listed as contributors in package.json and romainmenke is a trusted publisher with 1096 approved packages. | ai | |
| maintainer-change | maintainer-added | AI (maintainer-change): romainmenke is a well-established csstools maintainer; this is a legitimate org-level maintainer addition, not a takeover. | ai | |
| license | uncommon-license:MIT-0 | AI (license): MIT-0 is a well-known permissive license used consistently across the @csstools ecosystem. Not a risk. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@csstools/utilities | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org dependency within the csstools monorepo; phantom signal is a build artifact, not a risk. | ai | |
| phantom-deps | phantom-dep:@csstools/css-tokenizer | AI (phantom-deps): Same-org dependency within the csstools monorepo; phantom signal is a build artifact, not a risk. | ai |
Versions (showing 22 of 22)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 4.0.0 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.0.4 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.0.3 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.0.2 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.0.1 | 2 / 0 | |
| 3.0.0 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.0.11 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.0.10 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.0.9 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.0.8 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.0.7 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.0.6 | 2 / 0 | |
| 2.0.5 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.0.4 | 1 / 0 | |
| 2.0.3 | 1 / 1 | |
| 2.0.2 | 1 / 1 | |
| 2.0.1 | 1 / 1 | |
| 2.0.0 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.0.3 | 1 / 1 | |
| 1.0.2 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.0.1 | 1 / 0 | |
| 1.0.0 | 0 / 1 |
v4.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.0.4
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v3.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v3.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v3.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v3.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.11
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.10
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.9
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.8
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.7
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2024-03-13. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.6
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2024-02-19. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.5
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2023-12-31. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.4
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2023-12-15. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.3
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2023-09-24. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.2
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2023-09-18. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.1
2 findingsThis version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2023-07-24. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.
Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v2.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.
v1.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v1.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.