← Home

@csstools/postcss-font-format-keywords

Use unquoted format on @font-face CSS definitions.

10
Versions
MIT-0
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures gitHead linked

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

jonathantnealalagunaromainmenke

Keywords

cssembedded-opentypefontfont-format-keywordsformatopentypepostcss-plugintruetypewoffwoff2

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance publisher-changed AI (provenance): romainmenke is a documented csstools org maintainer with 1010 approved packages and 0 rejections; this is a legitimate maintainer transition within the csstools ecosystem. ai
maintainer-change maintainer-added AI (maintainer-change): romainmenke is a well-established, trusted publisher in the csstools org; addition is a legitimate transition, not a takeover. ai
license uncommon-license:MIT-0 AI (license): MIT-0 is a recognized permissive license (MIT without attribution) used consistently across the csstools ecosystem. Not a security or legal risk. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:@csstools/utilities AI (phantom-deps): Same-org dependency within the csstools monorepo; phantom detection is a false positive for monorepo build patterns. ai
phantom-deps phantom-dep:postcss-value-parser AI (phantom-deps): Referenced in config files as documented; phantom detection is a false positive for this build setup. ai

Versions (showing 10 of 10)

Version Deps Published
5.0.0 2 / 0
4.0.0 2 / 0
3.0.2 2 / 0
3.0.1 1 / 0
3.0.0 1 / 1
2.0.2 1 / 0
2.0.1 1 / 0
2.0.0 1 / 0
1.0.1 1 / 0
1.0.0 1 / 0

v5.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v4.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v3.0.2

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: alaguna → romainmenke (on 2024-02-19) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2024-02-19. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.0.1

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: alaguna → romainmenke (on 2023-12-15) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2023-12-15. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v3.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.2

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v2.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v1.0.1

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v1.0.0

1 finding
LOW No provenance attestation provenance

Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.