← Home

@babel/plugin-syntax-class-properties

Allow parsing of class properties

10
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures No source commit

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

hzoologanfsmythdanezexistentialismnicolo-ribaudojlhwung

Keywords

babel-plugin

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance publisher-changed AI (provenance): jlhwung is a well-established Babel core team member (156 packages, 2773 approved). Publisher rotation within the Babel team is expected and not a compromise signal. ai
maintainer-change maintainer-added AI (maintainer-change): jlhwung is a known Babel team contributor with a long track record. Addition reflects normal team maintenance, not a takeover. ai
bogus-package bogus-package AI (bogus-package): Babel monorepo packages are intentionally tiny, use synchronized semver, and are mass-produced under @babel/* — all bogus-package signals are structural false positives for this ecosystem. ai
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Package predates widespread npm provenance adoption; published by a verified Babel core team member from the official babel/babel monorepo. ai

Versions (showing 10 of 10)

Hide prereleases
Version Deps Published
7.12.13 1 / 1
7.12.1 1 / 1
7.10.4 1 / 1
7.10.1 1 / 1
7.8.3 1 / 1
7.8.0 1 / 1
7.7.4 1 / 1
7.2.0 1 / 1
7.0.0 1 / 1
7.0.0-beta.31 0 / 1

v7.12.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.10.4

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: nicolo-ribaudo → jlhwung (on 2020-06-30) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2020-06-30. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.10.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.8.3

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.8.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v7.7.4

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v7.2.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v7.0.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v7.0.0-beta.31

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.