← Home

@babel/plugin-proposal-export-namespace-from

Compile export namespace to ES2015

19
Versions
MIT
License
No
Install Scripts
Missing
Provenance

Supply chain provenance

Status for the latest visible version.

No SLSA provenance npm registry signatures No source commit

Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.

Maintainers

hzooexistentialismnicolo-ribaudojlhwung

Keywords

babel-plugin

Accepted risks

Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.

SourceRuleReasonAccepted byWhen
provenance missing-githead AI (provenance): Babel monorepo publish pipeline change; no security implication. nicolo-ribaudo is a trusted core Babel maintainer and this pattern is consistent across Babel packages. ai
maintainer-change maintainer-removed AI (maintainer-change): Removal of loganfsmyth and danez reflects legitimate Babel team org changes, not a takeover. nicolo-ribaudo is a known core maintainer. ai
provenance publisher-changed AI (provenance): Publisher change from nicolo-ribaudo to jlhwung reflects normal Babel team rotation; both are documented core contributors to the babel/babel monorepo. ai
maintainer-change maintainer-added AI (maintainer-change): jlhwung is a known Babel team member; maintainer additions within the @babel org are routine and not a risk signal for this package. ai
bogus-package bogus-package AI (bogus-package): hzoo is Henry Zhu, Babel project lead — spam flag is a false positive for this well-known open source maintainer. ai
dependencies unvetted-dep:@babel/plugin-syntax-export-namespace-from AI (dependencies): @babel/plugin-syntax-export-namespace-from is an official Babel monorepo package; this intra-Babel dependency is stable and expected for this plugin. ai
provenance no-provenance AI (provenance): Babel packages predate Sigstore provenance adoption; absence is expected and not a risk signal for this well-established publisher. ai

Versions (showing 19 of 19)

Version Deps Published
7.18.9 2 / 2
7.18.6 2 / 2
7.17.12 2 / 2
7.16.7 2 / 2
7.16.5 2 / 2
7.16.0 2 / 2
7.14.5 2 / 2
7.14.2 2 / 2
7.12.13 2 / 2
7.12.1 2 / 2
7.12.0 2 / 2
7.10.4 2 / 2
7.10.1 2 / 2
7.8.3 2 / 2
7.8.0 2 / 2
7.7.4 2 / 2
7.5.2 2 / 2
7.2.0 2 / 2
7.0.0 2 / 2

v7.18.6

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: nicolo-ribaudo.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.17.12

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: nicolo-ribaudo.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.16.7

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: nicolo-ribaudo.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.16.5

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: nicolo-ribaudo.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.16.0

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: nicolo-ribaudo.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.14.5

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: nicolo-ribaudo.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.14.2

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: nicolo-ribaudo.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.12.13

2 findings
HIGH Missing gitHead — previous versions had it provenance

This version has no gitHead field linking it to a source commit, but previous versions did. This suggests the publish environment changed. Published by: nicolo-ribaudo.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.12.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.12.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.10.4

2 findings
HIGH Publisher changed: nicolo-ribaudo → jlhwung (on 2020-06-30) provenance

This version was published by a different npm account than previous versions on 2020-06-30. This could indicate a legitimate maintainer transition or an account compromise.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.10.1

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.8.3

2 findings
HIGH Low-value / spam package indicators (3 signals, score 7) bogus-package

Matched 3 signal(s), weighted score 7: • [S_KNOWN_SPAM_PUBLISHER] Maintainer(s) previously flagged as spam: loganfsmyth, hzoo. • [S_PUBLISHER_MASS_PRODUCTION] Maintainer 'loganfsmyth' owns 167 packages, ≥70% share a templated name shape. • [S_TINY_PAYLOAD] Tiny payload: 1 code file(s), 4077 bytes total.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.8.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.7.4

2 findings
HIGH Low-value / spam package indicators (3 signals, score 7) bogus-package

Matched 3 signal(s), weighted score 7: • [S_KNOWN_SPAM_PUBLISHER] Maintainer(s) previously flagged as spam: loganfsmyth, hzoo. • [S_PUBLISHER_MASS_PRODUCTION] Maintainer 'loganfsmyth' owns 167 packages, ≥70% share a templated name shape. • [S_TINY_PAYLOAD] Tiny payload: 1 code file(s), 4077 bytes total.

INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.5.2

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Consider requesting the maintainer enable provenance via CI/CD.

v7.2.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.

v7.0.0

1 finding
INFO No provenance attestation provenance

[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.