@astrojs/cloudflare
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Maintainers
Keywords
Versions (showing 30 of 30)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 13.6.0 | 6 / 8 | |
| 13.5.5 | 6 / 8 | |
| 13.5.4 | 6 / 8 | |
| 13.5.3 | 6 / 8 | |
| 13.5.2 | 6 / 8 | |
| 13.5.1 | 6 / 8 | |
| 13.5.0 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.4.0 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.3.1 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.3.0 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.2.2 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.2.1 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.2.0 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.1.10 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.1.9 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.1.8 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.1.7 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.1.6 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.1.5 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.1.4 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.1.3 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.1.2 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.1.1 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.1.0 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.0.2 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.0.1 | 6 / 6 | |
| 13.0.0 | 6 / 6 | |
| 12.6.13 | 6 / 5 | |
| 12.6.12 | 6 / 5 | |
| 12.6.11 | 6 / 5 |
v13.6.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.5.5
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.5.4
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.5.3
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.5.2
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.5.1
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.5.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.4.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.3.1
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.3.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.2.2
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.2.1
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.2.0
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.1.10
1 findingPublished via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.1.9
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.1.8
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.1.7
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.1.6
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.1.5
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.1.4
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.1.3
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.1.2
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.1.1
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.1.0
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.0.2
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.0.1
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v13.0.0
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v12.6.13
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v12.6.12
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.
v12.6.11
2 findingsCVSS 2.2 (LOW) — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L ## Summary The `fetch()` call for remote images in `packages/integrations/cloudflare/src/utils/image-binding-transform.ts` (line 28) uses the default `redirect: 'follow'` behavior. This allows the Cloudflare Worker to follow HTTP redirects to arbitrary URLs, bypassing the `isRemoteAllowed()` domain allowlist check which only validates the initial URL. All three other image fetch paths in the codebase correctly use `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8. Confirmed on HEAD. ## Root Cause `image-binding-transform.ts` line 28: const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc) : assets.fetch(imageSrc)); Missing `{ redirect: 'manual' }`. The three protected paths: // image-passthrough-endpoint.ts:23 response = await fetch(href, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/endpoint/shared.ts:11 const res = await fetch(src, { redirect: 'manual' }); // assets/utils/remoteProbe.ts:53 const response = await fetch(url, { redirect: 'manual' }); ## PoC Demonstrated with Node.js that `fetch()` without `redirect: 'manual'` follows 302 redirects to arbitrary destinations: # Server A (allowed domain) returns 302 → Server B (internal) fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg') → follows 302 → hits http://internal:19742/secret fetch('http://allowed:19741/img.jpg', {redirect:'manual'}) → returns 302, internal server NOT hit Attack path: attacker finds an open redirect on an allowed domain, crafts `/_image?href=https://allowed-cdn.com/redirect?url=http://internal-service/`, and the Worker follows the redirect to the unauthorized destination. ## Impact Bypasses the `image.domains` and `image.remotePatterns` allowlist for the default Cloudflare image service (`cloudflare-binding`). Enables blind SSRF to domains not in the allowlist. Same vulnerability class as GHSA-qpr4-c339-7vq8 (HIGH) which fixed the passthrough endpoint but missed this one. ## Suggested Fix const content = await (isRemotePath(href) ? fetch(imageSrc, { redirect: 'manual' }) : assets.fetch(imageSrc));
Published via CI/CD with Sigstore attestation (predicate: https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1). This is the strongest supply chain integrity signal.