@-xun/project-fs
Supply chain provenance
Status for the latest visible version.
Without SLSA provenance there is no cryptographic link between this tarball and the public source — the axios compromise (March 2026) relied on exactly this gap.
Maintainers
Accepted risks
Findings the reviewer chose to accept rather than block on.
| Source | Rule | Reason | Accepted by | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:rejoinder | AI (dependencies): Same publisher ecosystem; no adverse signals. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@-xun/fs | AI (dependencies): Same publisher (xunnamius) with clean track record; scoped sibling package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@-xun/run | AI (dependencies): Same publisher (xunnamius) with clean track record; scoped sibling package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@-xun/project-types | AI (dependencies): Same publisher (xunnamius) with clean track record; scoped sibling package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:@-xun/memoize | AI (dependencies): Same publisher (xunnamius) with clean track record; scoped sibling package. | ai | |
| dependencies | unvetted-dep:named-app-errors | AI (dependencies): Same publisher ecosystem; no adverse signals. | ai | |
| provenance | no-provenance | AI (provenance): Publisher has an established track record; missing provenance is common and not a risk signal here. | ai |
Versions (showing 8 of 8)
| Version | Deps | Published |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0.7 | 9 / 2 | |
| 2.0.6 | 9 / 2 | |
| 2.0.5 | 9 / 2 | |
| 2.0.4 | 9 / 2 | |
| 2.0.3 | 9 / 2 | |
| 2.0.2 | 9 / 2 | |
| 2.0.1 | 9 / 2 | |
| 2.0.0 | 9 / 2 |
v2.0.7
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.6
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.5
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.4
1 finding[Accepted risk] Package was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.3
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.2
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.1
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.
v2.0.0
1 findingPackage was published without Sigstore provenance. Only ~12% of npm packages have provenance, so this is common but not ideal.